ziggys_human

whatever you say

how in fks name have we lost to that shower of sh*te?

the arse can now concentrate on the other three competitions they're not gonna win

yes...if i so desired it's just my preference, and i rank him 4th of our outstanding centre backs (opinions are like arseholes...we don't have to care for other peoples 😆)

i prefer all 3 ahead of sepp

good to see their over rate up at 15...within 1 and a half hours

yee-haw is out for 3 games, correct?

i corrected auto correct from 'correcting' it to analysts 🤣

i wanna see more of the performance we saw against tottingham, which had us and the tv anal cysts creaming have we seen it since? kinda, but not really

tempts me to say, from the nationwide tv advert..."you're not my daughter, you're an AI" 🤣

there IS no guy salmon, thames ditton anymore

that wasn't a foul throw for lincoln's equaliser?...okay, lino

be surprised if carrick isn't joined by pierre sage in receiving his p45

so criticism = support?

must be a road of a wicket when 429 isn't likely to be enough

rather like many convicted crimin

quite the chastening home defeat for the scousers dey-do-do-dat-doh-dont-dey-doh

:cry: a teary, tear drop

collectors item...vita booked

who cut his hair? the council?

if points penalty was argued down to, say, 114 points (1 for every proven charge), they'd carry over the uncleared deficit into championship season 27-28. seems fair they then are hard pushed to come back up at the first time of asking, given...

any punishment will be argued too lenient in the eyes of a manchester cheaty persuasion :LOL:

as I understand things: a) they have a right to appeal (exercised) b) the appeal has to have basis on the original facts upon what it drew its verdict, not new 'evidence' and new excuse c) appealing just because you don't like/agree with...

a step up from intimidating a witness is intimidating a prosecution